William Einwechter has written an excellent article summing up the biblical requirements for the sorts of civil magistrates who should be chosen to rule. I only have a couple of brief things to say in addition to what he has said.
First, my one disagreement with Einwechter's article is when he says this: "But how does the biblical teaching on choosing magistrates apply in instances where there are no candidates who meet the biblical standards? This is debated among Christians. Some advocate strict compliance with the biblical standards at all times and all places. Others argue that strict compliance is only fully possible in a covenant nation (which is the goal); in the meantime, we should use our vote to support men of ability and integrity who are generally in agreement with biblical standards of law and justice." Einwechter leaves this question unanswered, but it seems to me the answer is pretty clear. When are we ever authorized to ignore God's standards? If I happen to be in a church where the only candidates put forward for the pastoral office are a liberal homosexual man and a (relatively) theologically conservative heterosexual woman, what should I do? Should I vote for the woman, reasoning that although the Bible does not allow women to be pastors, yet at least she is much better than the alternative? Or should I refuse to vote for either of them and focus my attention on changing the underlying unacceptable situation? Surely I should not choose either of them, as God has not authorized us to choose either homosexuals or women to be our pastors. Doesn't the same reasoning apply here? Should we not refrain from voting if all we are given are unqualified candidates, and focus instead on changing this situation?
My other comment is simply that I would add a couple of references from Deuteronomy 17 to the verses already cited by Pastor Einwechter. In Deuteronomy 17:8-11, we read this:
“If a matter arises which is too hard for you to judge, between degrees of guilt for bloodshed, between one judgment or another, or between one punishment or another, matters of controversy within your gates, then you shall arise and go up to the place which the Lord your God chooses. And you shall come to the priests, the Levites, and to the judge there in those days, and inquire of them; they shall pronounce upon you the sentence of judgment. You shall do according to the sentence which they pronounce upon you in that place which the Lord chooses. And you shall be careful to do according to all that they order you. According to the sentence of the law in which they instruct you, according to the judgment which they tell you, you shall do; you shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left from the sentence which they pronounce upon you.”
In 17:18-20, we read this:
“Also it shall be, when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write for himself a copy of this law in a book, from the one before the priests, the Levites. And it shall be with him, and he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the Lord his God and be careful to observe all the words of this law and these statutes, that his heart may not be lifted above his brethren, that he may not turn aside from the commandment to the right hand or to the left, and that he may prolong his days in his kingdom, he and his children in the midst of Israel.”
Both of these passages indicate that rulers are to determine what laws they should enact, how they should punish crime, and in general every aspect of how they ought to rule, not according to their own whims, but according to the law of God. Anyone who is put forward for the office of civil magistrate who does not understand this clearly, who is not willing to put himself forward clearly as taking God's laws as the foundation of his duty, who puts forward secular principles as the foundation of his duty, etc., is not biblically qualified to be chosen as a civil magistrate. Einwechter brought out these points well, but these additional verses add to his case.
See also this series of exchanges between Steve Halbrook and Bojidar Marinov, applying the question of this post to voting for Ron Paul in particular. They discuss the issue of how biblically qualified a candidate must be in order to justify voting for him.
And don't forget! There is a political party in existence that supports a political philosophy based on the whole counsel of God - the Reformation Party (http://www.reformationparty.org/). Come and join us! See also my previous post on the philosophical foundations of the Reformation Party at http://freethoughtforchrist.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-philosophical-foundations-of.html.